Summary
The Good, The Bad And The Uglyis one of Clint Eastwood’s best movies, in large part because of a historically inaccurate scene. This film, which is the third in a trilogy about life in the Wild West during the Civil War, is widely considered to be one of the best Westerns ever made. It revolves around three gunslingers looking for treasure in the war-torn American Southwest.The meaning behind the title ofThe Good, The Bad, and The Uglyis far deeper than those being the nicknames of the three main characters, which adds to its depth.
The film resonated with American audiences, partially because the three archetypal characters reflected their beliefs that nothing would ever be the same as it had been before the turbulent 1960s.The ending ofThe Good, The Bad and the Uglyhelped cement its legacy as one of the best all-time Western movies. Historians have labeled one part of this movie as more myth than fact, but that has done little to change its statusas one of the best films of Eastwood’s career.
Why Clint Eastwood’s The Good, The Bad and The Ugly Ending Is The “Greatest Myth” Explained By Western Historian
An expert breaks down Clint Eastwood’s The Good, The Bad and the Ugly ending shootout, highlighting the “greatest myth” of the Old West.
The Iconic Gunfight Reinforced Myths About How Often Such Battles Occurred
The gunfight at the end of the film is one of the movie’s best sequences. The three protagonists are fighting over the gold they’ve found, each wanting to walk off with the entire fortune himself, leading to a tense standoff until finally Blondie (Clint Eastwood) shoots Angel Eyes (Lee Van Cleef). The scene is extremely tense and includes the third man, Tuco’s (Eil Wallach) gun not firing because it is out of bullets. After Angel Eyes' death, Blondie settles his feud with Tuco by hanging him but shooting the noose down at the last minute.
Yellowstone’s season 1 finale uses a similar setup, with the evil Dan Jenkins appearing to be hanged.
Although the tension and drama of this scene cemented it as a classic,the gunfight is not historically accurate. In reality, most people did not carry guns in the Wild West, and there weren’t quick draw-type duels like the one depicted in the film. Furthermore, the types of weapons used during that time period made it unlikely that one cowboy could easily shoot another at the distance depicted in films likeThe Good, The Bad and The Ugly.However,the historical inaccuracy does not detract from the film’s quality, especially since audiences expected scenes like this.
It Would Not Have Been As Dramatic And Compelling Without The Gunfight
The gunfight at the end of the film was deeply satisfying, especially to that segment of the audience that hadwatched theDollars Trilogyin order. Blondie emerged as the hero and could have been the last man standing, but he chose to end his feud with Tuco in a different manner at the end of the tense showdown, which would not have happened had the film skipped the gunfight in order to be historically accurate.
1964
1965
The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
1966
A film likeThe Good, The Bad And The Uglythat is set in the Wild West with characters who are willing to use violence to solve their problems wouldn’t make sense without the climactic gunfight, especially given the bad blood between Blondie and Tuco. Blondie had abandoned Tuco in the desert before, and Tuco had gotten revenge by forcing Blondie to march through the desert until he collapsed from dehydration, soit would have been unrealistic to expect these characters to settle their differences non-violently.
The gunfight scene is a beautiful piece of cinematography that demonstrates the principle of the characters being true to themselves being more important than historical accuracy.
Furthermore, the gunfight is widely considered one of the best sequences in the genre because of its tension. It makes good use of dramatic timing, featuring a long pause before Angel Eyes draws his gun and Blondie fatally shoots him, and the fight is made even more compelling by the musical score accompanying the scene. The gunfight scene is a beautiful piece of cinematography that demonstrates the principle of the characters being true to themselves being more important than historical accuracy.
The Film Was Not Meant To Be A Historically Accurate Depiction of The Civil War
The Good, The Bad and The Uglyis by no means an accurate Civil War depiction, nor was it intended to be. The film made mistakes such as using Gatling guns, which were even less common in New Mexico than in the parts of the United States where the Civil War was being fought. Additionally, in real life, soldiers did not blow up bridges during the Battle of Glorietta Pass, though many battles were fought over bridges.
The writers clearly took liberties with the historical material to create an entertaining film, and it worked.The Good, The Bad And The Uglyfails as a documentary about the Civil War, but that wasn’t its intended purpose. The movie revitalized the Western genre at a time when audiences were growing bored, provided a solid story with strong characters, and concluded with an iconic gunfight that more than made up for historical inaccuracy with its dramatic tension.
The Good the Bad and the Ugly
Cast
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is a Spaghetti Western directed by Sergio Leone, scored by Ennio Morricone, and starring Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef, and Eli Wallach as three gunslingers who compete for a cache of Confederate gold during the American Civil War. The 1966 film is regarded as one of the greatest Westerns of all time.
